Brick Walls - Genealogical Conundrums

What is a Brick Wall? 

 

Aside from the obvious answer, a Brick Wall is a term used within the genealogical community to describe the point where a particular line in your research has ground to a halt. It arises where you simply cannot prove a particular fact that would allow you to progress further.

Do I have a lot of these brick walls?

 

Though I have been researching the Kingshott family for years, there are still quite a few lines of research that are "floating" outside the main tree.

 

From my research, it is clear that all Kingshotts are related but proving this is sometimes difficult. It becomes especially difficult prior to the 19th century when every male is called John or William and every female is called Mary or Elizabeth. I, therefore, have a number of what I call "floating trees" that I research in the hope of one day joining them to the main tree. 

 

That I do have brick walls can be seen as a good thing, at least from a genealogical point of view. It demonstrates that I don’t guess at a given relationship and show it as a fact when the evidence does not exist to prove it. If I cannot prove the link I will not show it, however frustrating that may be for me.

 

An example of a current brick wall is the Kingshotte family . I can get them back to London in the 1860's but lose them there. The two older members of this elusive family just appear in the later census'. Work is continuing to try to find out where they came from.

 

There are, however, a number of other "floating trees" where people crop up in the parish registers, and I have no idea where they come from. As time goes on, I usually manage to link these people in, but sometimes I just can't seem to do it. This is usually because they are simply referred to as "John Kingshott" and could be one of several possibilities. 

 

 

Errant Appearances in Documents

 

Here are some examples of what I am talking about. These are some occurrences of Kingshott family members, simply appearing in documents without providing information on where they fit into the tree. 

This is a page from the baptismal register for St George Hanover Square in London. The third person to appear in this section of the document is the baptism of Adile, daughter of Eliza Kingshott, baptised on 19th January 1863. She was baptised from the Workhouse. So far, so good. The problem is that there is no mention anywhere of any child called Adile and I have no idea which Eliza Kingshott this could be. Indeed, at the moment, I don't even think that I have any possibilities. 

 

What I do, therefore, is add the information that I do know to my tree. This creates what I call a "floating branch" where I can add all the information that I know, but that just sits there in the hope that more information is found that will enable me to place Eliza into the wider family. It looks quite sad on the tree, but allows me to search for documents and information without forgetting her. 

Another example is this burial register that records, on the second entry, the burial of a 10-month-old Albert Kingshott in Finchley, North London. The only problem is that I cannot find a person of that name, born around 1879, that is not already placed elsewhere in the tree with documentary evidence proving that they are not this person. So, once again, he sits alone on the tree waiting for information that will link him into the wider family. 

At least with this one, I can apply for a birth certificate that would give me his parents. This is, however, an expensive exercise with each certificate costing the best part of £10. However, often, this is the only way to solve the mystery in the absence of a baptism which, in this case, doesn't appear to have occurred. 

 

Further back in time, the amount of information available on the parish registers is often nothing more than a name. 

The third example is illustrated here. This is James Kingshott born circa 1811 but who died in 1849, two years before I would have been able to retrieve his birthplace from the 1851 census. James married Caroline Woods in Godalming, Surrey, England in 1836, again, just before civil registration in the UK would have provided me with his father's name! He certainly did all he could to make things difficult for me! This is his death certificate, which doesn't really help other than to confirm his approximate birth year. Click on the image to enlarge it.

James Kingshott 1811-1849 Death Certific

Once again, I have a number of descendants of James Kingshott, but they all prove very elusive to follow through the ages.

I usually manage to link these people eventually though!

© 2009- 2019 by Jan Brian Kingshott - All Rights Reserved - Created with Wix.com